CSS Namespaces Disposition of Comments

This is the disposition of comments for the 15 February 2008 CSS Namespaces Last Call Working Draft. No outstanding objections remain.

Issue 1
Summary Clarify "no namespace"
From Christof Hoeke
Comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0148.html
Closed Accepted
Verified http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0191.html
Issue 2
Summary Clarify validity / semantics of empty string namespace declarations.
From Christof Hoeke
Comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0148.html
Response http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0199.html
Closed Accepted
Issue 3
Summary Example numbering off
From Erik Dahlstrom, on behalf of SVGWG
Comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0128.html
Response http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0135.html
Closed Accepted
Issue 4
Summary Change order requirements for @namespace
From Erik Dahlstrom, on behalf of SVGWG
Comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0129.html
Response http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0133.html
Response http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0136.html
Closed Retracted
Verified http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0158.html
Issue 5
Summary Concerns about asterisk definitions
From Erik Dahlstrom, on behalf of SVGWG
Comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0130.html
Response http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0134.html
Response http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0139.html
Closed Accepted
Verified http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0155.html
Issue 6
Summary Conflict in application of default namespace
From Erik Dahlstrom, on behalf of SVGWG
Comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0131.html
Response http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0141.html
Closed Accepted
Issue 7
Summary Add example of non-matching prefixes denoting the same expanded name
From Erik Dahlstrom, on behalf of SVGWG
Comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0132.html
Response http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0142.html
Closed Accepted
Verified http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0154.html
Issue 8
Summary Remove default namespaces feature / Add note explaining impact on selectors
From Steven Pemberton, on behalf of XHTML2WG
Comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0153.html
Response http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0188.html
Comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0279.html
Response http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0283.html
Comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0344.html
Response http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0345.html
Comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0346.html
Response http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0348.html
Comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0349.html
Closed Rejected (to remove namespace feature)
Comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0384.html
Response http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Apr/0034.html
Response http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Apr/0037.html
Closed Accepted (to add note instead)
Verified http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Apr/0299.html
Issue 9
Summary Clarify empty string namespaces
From Anne van Kesteren
Comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2008Mar/0015.html
Testcase http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Apr/0391.html
Response http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Apr/0396.html
Response http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Apr/0431.html
Closed Accepted