Open//Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted Issue 1. Summary: Rephrase Scope (3.2) From: Lachlan Hunt Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Aug/0278.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0144.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0146.html ---- Issue 2. Summary: Link to test case for each feature From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Key: [css3-namespace] General comment Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0019.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0023.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0053.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0075.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0077.html Closed: Accepted. ---- Issue 3. Summary: Say what kind of namespaces From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Key: [css3-namespace] Abstract section clarity Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0020.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0153.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0157.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0054.html Closed: Rejected Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0074.html ---- Issue 4a. Summary: Link to or explain "forward compatible parsing rules" From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Key: [css3-namespace] Conformance with CSS forward compatible parsing rules Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0025.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0189.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0265.html ---- Issue 4b. Summary: Move comment on "forward compatible parsing rules" from Intro to Conformance From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Key: [css3-namespace] Conformance with CSS forward compatible parsing rules Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0025.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0189.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0271.html Closed: Rejected ---- Issue 5. Summary: Avoid "this specification" From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Key: [css3-namespace] Editorial Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0029.html #1 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0057.html Closed: Accepted. Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0069.html ---- Issue 6. Summary: Rewrite reference to XML-NAMES11 From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Key: [css3-namespace] Editorial Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0029.html #2 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0060.html Closed: Accepted. Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0070.html ---- Issue 7. Summary: Rephrase non-normative designation From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Key: [css3-namespace] Editorial Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0029.html #3 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Oct/0004.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 8. Summary: "default default namespace" From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Key: [css3-namespace] Editorial Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0029.html #4 Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0038.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Oct/0005.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 9. Summary: Update references to XML-NAMES From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0026.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0063.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0082.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0083.html ---- Issue 10. Summary: RFC2119 should be normative reference From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0021.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0148.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 11. Summary: Use RFC2119 for all requirements From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Key: [css3-namespace] Requirements of the document as framed by RFC 2119 Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0022.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0190.html Closed: Rejected Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0264.html ---- Issue 11a. Summary: Clearly distinguish examples from normative text From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Key: [css3-namespace] Requirements of the document as framed by RFC 2119 Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0264.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0272.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 12. Summary: Have an issues list From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Key: [css3-namespace] Issues list for CSS Namespaces Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0024.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0055.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0073.html ---- Issue 13. Summary: Clarify conformance section From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0030.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0056.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0072.html ---- Issue 14. Summary: Link to CSS 2.1 Grammar appendix From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0027.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0145.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 15. Summary: Why is url() defined, then discouraged? From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0028.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Oct/0006.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0059.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 16. Summary: Define "conforming style sheet" From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0032.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0065.html Closed: Accepted. Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0081.html ---- Issue 17. Summary: Case-insensitivity of prefixes causes problems From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0033.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0047.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0086.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0048.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0048.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0050.html Closed: Invalid ---- Issue 18. Summary: Split apart sentences with many requirements From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0035.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0066.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0080.html Closed: ... ---- Issue 19. Summary: Requirements for undeclared prefixes too lax From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0031.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0067.html Closed: Accepted. Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0079.html ---- Issue 20. Summary: Confusion about @namespace scope and selector matching From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Key: [css3-namespace] Scope of Namespace with @import Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0037.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0039.html Closed: Invalid Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0273.html ---- Issue 21. Summary: Namespace prefix represents namespace (name) untestable From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0034.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0068.html Closed: Rejected Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0084.html ---- Issue 22. Summary: QNames for attributes From: Karl Dubost for QA Review Key: [css3-namespace] CSS Qualified Names and values of attributes Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0036.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Oct/0003.html Closed: OutOfScope ---- Issue 23. Summary: Clarify justification and consequences of prefix case-insensitivity From: Grosso, Paul for XML Core WG Key: [css3-namespace] XML Core WG's review Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0045.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Oct/0008.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 24. Summary: Need normative reference to XML Names 1.0 & 1.1 From: Grosso, Paul for XML Core WG Key: [css3-namespace] XML Core WG's review Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0045.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0061.html Closed: Partially Rejected ---- Issue 25. Summary: Clarify that neither url() nor string syntax accepts normalization From: Grosso, Paul Key: [css3-namespace] XML Core WG's review Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0045.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Oct/0007.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 26. Summary: Case sensitivity issue From: Bjoern Hoehrmann Comment: Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0062.html Closed: Something.