Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-background-20120214/ #Audience: WG Audience: Director Set Audience to Director for an HTML version without the Edit fields. Currently lists all comments on www-style between Feb 14 (publication date) and Mar 13, 2012 (comment deadline was Mar 6). Open//Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response. Issue 1. Summary: Add 'background-position-x' and 'background-position-y' From: Florian Rivoal Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0618.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0628.html Closed: Rejected Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0630.html ---- Issue 2. Summary: Computed value line for 'background-repeat' is imprecise From: David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1094.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0587.html Closed: Accepted Edit: Edited Issue: 3 Summary: Reorder the border-*-radius definitions in the spec From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html Closed: Accepted Edit: Edited Issue: 4 Summary: “Applies to” for 'border-radius' doesn't match prose From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html Closed: Accepted Edit: Edited Issue: 5 Summary: Negative values for 'border-radius' should explicitly be illegal From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html Closed: Accepted Edit: Edited Issue: 6 Summary: Rephrase note about inner curve in 5.2 From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html Closed: Accepted Edit: Elika replaced “adjacent corner” by “opposite side” and will add an image Issue: 7 Summary: Unclear text about corner transitions in 5.4 From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html Edit: Changed to “Otherwise, the center of color and style transitions between adjoining borders must a point along the curve that is a continuous monotonic function of the ratio of the border widths. However it is not defined what these transitions look like or what function maps from this ratio to a point on the curve.” Closed: Accepted Issue: 8 Summary: Insert “two corresponding” in the formula in 5.5 From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html Closed: Accepted Edit: Edited Issue: 9 Summary: Remove redundant paragraph “The rendering must be exactly…” in 5.5 From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html Closed: Accepted Edit: Edited Issue: 10 Summary: Example 24 should have only images A and B, D and C are the same From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html Closed: Accepted Edit: Labeled the images A B B A (no C and D) Issue: 11 Summary: Example 25 belongs in 5.1 instead of 5.6 From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html Closed: Accepted Edit: Edited Issue: 12 Summary: Use “{1,2}” instead of “?” in syntax of 'border-radius' From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html Closed: Accepted Edit: Edited Issue: 13 Summary: Initial value of 'border-radius' should be “see individual properties” From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html Closed: Accepted Edit: Edited Issue: 14 Summary: Also allow to specify corners with an instead of two From: Christoph Päper Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0324.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0117.html Closed: Rejected (new features are out of scope) Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0118.html Issue: 15 Summary: Add a “cut” corner style (border-corner-shape: normal|curved|sharp) From: Christoph Päper Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0324.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0117.html Closed: Rejected (new features are out of scope) Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0118.html Issue: 16 Summary: 'Border-image' syntax allows odd trailing slash. Syntax should disallow it. And maybe also disallow two slashes in a row. From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0179.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0605.html Edit: Proposal: Solution C, disallow trailing slash in syntax. (But still allow two slashes with nothing in between.) Closed: Accepted (solution C) Edit: Edited, but needs to be verified by WG Issue: 17 Summary: 'background' shorthand specification text fails to say that 'background-image' is reset. From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0134.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0595.html Closed: Accepted Edit: Edited Issue: 18 Summary: The specification should say which background and border properties apply to first-line and first-letter. From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0133.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0606.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0617.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0032.html Edit: Edited according to Proposal 2 in the last reply. Closed: Accepted Issue: 19 Summary: What is the background of the page area? From: Fantasai (WG member) Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0127.html Response: (Filed as issue for css3-page) Closed: OutOfScope Verified: Personal communication Issue: 20 Summary: Rewording and more verbose grammar (or an informative note) for 'background-position' From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0124.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0124.html Closed: Accepted Edit: Edited Issue: 21 Summary: Unclear what border style is used on table cells, when 'border-image-source' doesn't apply From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0109.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0602.html Closed: Accepted Edit: Added “(or doesn't apply)” after “cannot be displayed”; and added “otherwise the element's borders are invisible and the border image is drawn as described in the sections below.” Issue: 22 Summary: Clarify how border-image applies to table elements with collapsing borders (relation to border conflict resolution) From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0109.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0602.html Edit: Added “otherwise the element's borders are invisible and the border image is drawn”. Edit: Proposal for the rest has two options: (A) draw the table borders with invisible ink and then draw the image on top of it; or (B) an image border overrides any other border in the conflict resolution. (The difference is the calculation of the width of each cell.) Edit: WG decision: Make interaction of border-image with collapsed tables undefined, recommend not applying it to such tables in L3, expect it to be defined in L4. Edit: Edited as per the WG decision. (Added section 6.8.) Closed: Accepted Issue 23 Summary: Ambiguous phrasing about 'inset' and tables From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0106.html Closed: Accepted Edit: Edited (copied wording from CSS 2.1: “In the collapsing border model, drawn the same as 'ridge'.”) Issue 24 Summary: Line thickness in 4.3 uses ambiguous words “may not” (“may not be negative”). Should say: “are not allowed.” From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0103.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0603.html Closed: Accepted Edit: Edited Issue 25 Summary: Allow colors (esp. semi-transparent ones) on all background layers. Edit: Tab says (1st response) it's no longer needed, because you can soon use 'image(red)' anywhere a URL is allowed, and (2nd response) that it would throw off the layer counting for the 'background-color' property. From: Lev Solntsev Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1338.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1341.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1365.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1373.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0119.html Closed: Rejected Issue: 26 Summary: What is the “boundary” of a table cell? From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0592.html Edit: Edited: s/boundaries/far border edges/ Closed: Accepted