Last call document:http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-css3-background-20100612/
Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. Summary: Remove 'box-shadow' from At-Risk list From: Sylvain Galineau Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jun/0483.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0479.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 2. Summary: box-shadow spread should specify half the blur radius From: Tab Atkins? Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jun/0513.html Response: very long thread resulting in edits :) Closed: Accepted
Issue 3. Summary: border-radius for corner-radius confusing; make own section? From: CSS3.info / Jeffrey Gilbert, Krzysztof Maczyński Comment: http://www.css3.info/w3c-issues-last-call-for-comments-on-css3-backgrounds-and-borders/#comment-259427 Response: http://www.css3.info/w3c-issues-last-call-for-comments-on-css3-backgrounds-and-borders/#comment-259447 Closed: Accepted
Issue 4. Summary: inset box-shadow should paint over content From: divya manian Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jul/0422.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jul/0474.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0111.html Closed: Rejected
Issue 5. Summary: Initial value currentcolor not defined From: Christian Roth Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0015.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0016.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0019.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0480.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 6. Summary: Example inconsistent with prose From: Brian Manthos Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0368.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0369.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0370.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0383.html Closed: Invalid / OutOfScope
Issue 7. Summary: Not defined how border curve breaks across lines From: Sylvain Galineau Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0109.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0395.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 8. Summary: border-image width numbers should refer to *computed* border-widths From: Brad Kemper Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0065.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0066.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 9. Summary: Clarify how background shorthand sets values to layers From: Øyvind Stenhaug Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0387.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0478.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 10. Summary: Add syntax to mark foreground images used as background images From: Michael Cooper on behalf of PFWG Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0821.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0829.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-wai-pf/2010OctDec/0142.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/att-0356/css_response_from_pf.html
Issue 11. Summary: Reference WCAG 2.0 SC1.1.1 F3 From: Michael Cooper on behalf of PFWG Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0821.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0829.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/att-0356/css_response_from_pf.html
Issue 12. Summary: border-image shorthand inconsistent with CSS2.1 informative grammar From: Yves Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0078.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0405.html Closed: Rejected Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0484.html