Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-text-decor-3-20130103/
Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor-3/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted
, OutOfScope
,
Invalid
, Rejected
, or Retracted
.
Verified
indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Remove text-underline-position to allow creation of arbitrary decorations From: Sebastian Zartner Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0282.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0111.html Closed: Rejected Verified:
Issue 2. # Summary: Loosen position of emphasis marks when set on text with ruby From: Koji Ishii Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0086.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0092.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0102.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0122.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0112.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 3. # Summary: Clarify spaces skipped by 'text-decoration-skip' From: Addison Phillips Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0079.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0100.html Closed: Accepted Verified:
Issue 4. # Summary: Clarify positioning of emphasis marks vs. ruby From: Addison Phillips Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0079.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0101.html Closed: Invalid Verified:
Issue 5. # Summary: Should visible word separators be skipped by 'text-decoration-skip: spaces'? From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0100.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0113.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 6. # Summary: Drop 'text-underline-position: alphabetic'? From: dbaron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0529.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0578.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0139.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 7. # Summary: Define z-order of emphasis marks From: dbaron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0527.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0142.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 8. # Summary: Change of underline/overline z-order wrt CSS 2.1 From: dbaron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0526.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0141.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 9. # Summary: Define z-order of decorations drawn across atomic inlines From: dbaron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0525.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0140.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 10. # Summary: Positioning of under/left/right underlines unclear From: dbaron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0530.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0143.html Closed: Invalid
Issue 11. # Summary: Line positioning per-line or across lines? From: dbaron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0532.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0145.html Proposal: Mark undefined Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0105.html Closed: Deferred
Issue 12. # Summary: Line decorations should have consistent thickness (ignoring descendants) From: dbaron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0533.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0146.html Proposal: Mark undefined Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0105.html Closed: Deferred
Issue 13. # Summary: Line decorations should have consistent position (ignoring descendants) From: dbaron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0533.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0146.html Proposal: Mark undefined Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0105.html Closed: Deferred
Issue 14. # Summary: Underline positioning needs more detail From: dbaron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0530.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0534.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0147.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 15. # Summary: Should text-shadow be ink color or currentColor? From: dbaron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0150.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0177.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 16. # Summary: Shadow text + decorations: layer or composite? From: dbaron, fantasai Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/20130507060209.GA12331@crum.dbaron.org Comment: http://www.w3.org/mid/51B586EA.2030502@inkedblade.net Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0105.html Closed: Accepted