CR document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-flexbox-20120918/
Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-values/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. Summary: Handling of zero-length boxes at end of line From: Kang-Hao Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0094.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0158.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 2. Summary: Handling of negative-size flex lines From: Kang-Hao Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0094.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0158.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 3.
Summary: Need way to fill flex-item boxes / Make 'stretch' propagate definiteness
From: Rudolph Gottesheim
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0204.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0207.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0216.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0217.html
Closed: Open? Closed?
ACTION: Need to check against Grid to ensure consistent behavior
Notes: Alternative might be to reflow after stretching in order to resolve
percentages inside the item (but treat them as auto for finding the
flex item's size), then solve this with height: 100%.
Issue 4. Summary: Constant spacing around items From: Giuseppe Bilotta Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0249.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0046.html Closed: Deferred (most cases possible; maybe add more spacing controls in next level)
Issue 5.
Summary: If percentage height cannot be resolved, is the flex items stretched?
From: Ojan Vafai
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0220.html
Response: NEED TO RESPOND, ALSO NEED CSS2.1 ERRATUM
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15392
Closed: Open
Issue 6. Summary: Clarifications to abspos static position in flex containers From: Kang-Hao Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0478.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 7. Summary: Conflict in applicability of 'float' to flex items From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0675.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0698.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0691.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0701.html
Issue 8. Summary: Interaction of 'stretch' and items with aspect ratio From: Rossen Atanassov Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0781.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0040.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 9. Summary: Transfer min/max constraints across dimensions via aspect ratio? From: Kang-Hao Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0010.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0041.html Closed: Rejected
Issue 10. Summary: Do flex items with negative margins increas available space? From: Tony Chang Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0460.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0462.html Closed: Rejected
Issue 11. Summary: Stretch should clamp cross size to min/max before calculating flex base size From: Kang-Hao Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0061.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0157.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 12. Summary: Orthogonal Flex Layouts Sub-optimally Defined From: Rossen Atanassov Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0251.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0260.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 13. Summary: Should ::first-line/::first-letter apply to a flex container? From: Tab Atkins Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0264.html Response: Closed: Accepted
Issue 14. Summary: Clarify interaction of min-width and width From: Ojan Vafai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0046.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0050.html Closed: Invalid
Issue 15. Summary: Should 'overflow' apply to flex containers? From: Daniel Holbert Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0465.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0001.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 16. Summary: What should percentage margins on a flex item be relative to? From: fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0143.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0688.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 17. Summary: Revert min-size of flex items to 0. From: Tab Atkins Jr. Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0364.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0257.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 18.
Summary: Paint flex items and table cells atomically
From: fantasai
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0707.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0133.html
Closed: Accepted
Note: Recommends corresponding CSS2.1 change for Table layout, see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0145.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0027.html
Issue 19. Summary: Re-revert min-size of flex items back to 'auto', with overflow consideration From: Elliot Sprehn Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0538.html Open